FORM OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR EMPLOYERS AND WORKERS DURING THE PROCESS OF RESOLVING DISPUTES TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51804/jrhces.v3i1.989Keywords:
rights and obligations, industrial relations, termination disputesAbstract
This research was created to determine the form of legal protection for employers and workers during the process of resolving disputes termination of employment. This study uses a positive legal literature study on employment using a deductive-inductive approach and emphasizes on reality (law in action). The results showed a form of legal protection for employers and workers during the process of termination of employment consists of prevention (preventive) which in the context of the process of resolving disputes termination of employment is a concrete effort of the state in providing guarantees to human rights in the right of association and the right to negotiate together by providing opportunities to the parties who are disputing in terms of termination of employment relationships to conduct bipartite negotiations aimed at preventing the termination of employment in ways that can be agreed by both parties and can be carried out without anyone feeling harmed and justified by the law and repressive settlement in the process of resolving termination of employment disputes is the arrangement of settlement procedures arranged in such a way as to ensure equal opportunities upfront in law and fair treatment in employment relationships, whose concrete form is termination of employment without or not obtaining determination from the institution of settlement of industrial relations disputes is null and void, which results in the deletion of all or part of the matter related to termination of employment so that the employment relationship continues and all rights and obligations for the parties remain in force that must remain in force as long as it has not obtained a determination from the institution of settlement of industrial relations disputes until the decision or determination of a permanent legal force (inkraht van gewijsde)
References
BOOKS
Asnawi, M. N. (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata (Teori,Praktik dan Permasalahannya di Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama) (Cet.Pertam). UII Press.
Butarbutar, E. N. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum (langkah-langkah Untuk Menemukan Kebenaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum) (R. F. Kurnia (ed.); Kesatu). Refika Adhitama.
MPR RI. (2018). Panduan Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan Ketetapan Majelis Pemusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (Ketujuh be). Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
Subekti. (1985). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata (XXX). PT Intermasa.
JURNAL
Asmar, L. (2014). Problematika Independensi Hakim Agung. Koran Waspada, 1–7.
Gunawan, B. P., Mohamed, A. M. T., Dhofir, M., & Hamsa, A. (2018). Constitutional Structure of Indonesia Based on 1945 Constitution before and after Amendments. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4543
Kemenkumham, D. P. (2009). Penafsiran Undang-Undang dari Perspektif Penyelenggara Pemerintahan. Artikel Hukum Tata Negara dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/htn-dan-puu/231-penafsiran-undang-undang-dari-perspektif-penyelenggara-pemerintahan.html
Pratiwi, R. (2003). Sejarah Perburuhan Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa. JDIH Kemnaker, XIII, 22–40.
Santosa, F. (2015). Penerapan Konsep Batal Demi Hukum Di Peradilan Pidana, Perdata Dan Tata Usaha Negara. MAKSIGAMA.
Syafii, S., & Zamroni, M. (2018). Constitutional Rights And Legal Protection Agency Participant Of The Organizers Of The Social Security, Health Aspects Of Administrative Law. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum : Cogito Ergo Sum.
JUDGE'S DECISION
Putusan PHI Surabaya No. 97/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Sby, 1. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/6d7bfcf0b199a6a15be4cf6626b15be9.html
Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No.520K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015, (2015). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/7d7843ce7c05507420c2bcfbb0f4da40.html
Mahkamah Konstitusi. PUTUSAN MK No.37/PUU-IX/2011, 4 Mkri 1–40 (2011).
LAW
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945, 2002. https://jdih.mkri.id/mg58ufsc89hrsg/UUD_1945_Perubahan.pdf.
———. Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. LNRI Tahun.2003 Nomor.39 TLNRI Nomor.4279, 2003.
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Indonesia, 2004
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Indonesia, 2020.
Presiden RI. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 82 Tahun 2018 Tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. Indonesia, 2018.
———. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang PKWT, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Indonesia, 2021.
Menteri Tenaga kerja dan Transmigrasi. Surat Edaran No.643/MEN/PHI-PPHI/IX/2005. Indonesia, 2005.
INTERNET
Asmar, L. (2014). Problematika Independensi Hakim Agung. Koran Waspada, 1–7.
Channel, A. (2020). Pemberitahuan PHK dari PT.SHYANG YAO FUNG kepada karyawan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn68E-5SO-Q
Juanda, P. (2011). Putusan MK dan Ragam Tafsir tentang Upah Proses PHK. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4ef3dcaacf2c6/putusan-mk-dan-ragam-tafsir-tentang-upah-proses-phk-broleh--juanda-pangaribuan-?page=2
Nadia Kemala Movanita, A. (2015). Jimly : Jangan dipertentangkan antara SEMA dan Putusan MK. Kompas.https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/01/10/07383241/Jimly.Jangan.Dipertentangkan.antara.SEMA.dan.Putusan.MK
Online, B. (2015, April 29). Tak Terima di-PHK Dengan SMS, PHI Menangkan Buruh. Buruh Online. https://buruh-online.com/2015/04/tak-terima-diphk-dengan-sms-phi-menangkan-buruh.html
Online, B. (2019). Pemberitahuan PHK Lewat WhatsApp, Pekerja Tuntut Pesangon. Buruh Online. https://buruh-online.com/2019/08/pemberitahuan-phk-lewat-whatsapp-pekerja-tuntut-pesangon.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Reformasi Hukum : Cogito Ergo Sum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JRHCES di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.