Assessment Of Human Reliability Using The Sherpa And Heart Approach To Container Crane Operation Activities. (Case Study PT Petikemas Surabaya)

Authors

  • Asri Dwi Puspita Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif, Sidoarjo
  • Anthon De Fretes Universitas Atma Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51804/iej.v5i1.11888

Keywords:

SHERPA, HEART, container crane

Abstract

The port is a sea transportation infrastructure that plays an essential role in the growth of industry and trade. Ports are required to be able to serve operational activities 24/7, meaning 24 hours and 7 full days. Container Crane mainly carries out loading/unloading activities for containers (container B/M) for activities at the wharf. From 2015 to 2021, there have been accidents at PT TPS, as many as 1,074 incidents with an average annual incidence + 175 accident incidents. Errors from operating equipment or human error mainly cause accidents. This study aims to analyze human reliability assessment on CC operations using the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction (SHERPA) and Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) methods in conducting research using primary data through interviews with expert judgment. Based on the approach to using this method, it is hoped that recommendations can be made to control and prevent work accidents resulting from human error. Based on the results of error identification using the SHERPA method in CC operation, 14 error sub-tasks result in work accidents, 13 work sub-tasks must be recovered immediately, there are 2 sub-tasks with high probability, and there are 13 sub-tasks with a critical level of loss Not acceptable.

References

Heinrich, H. W. (1941). Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach. Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach., (Second Edition).

Kairupan, F. A., Doda, D. V., & Kairupan, R. (2019). “Hubungan Antara Unsafe Action dan Unsafe Condition dengan Kecelakaan Kerja pada Pengendara Ojek Online Dan Ojek Pangkalan di Kota Manado”. Jurnal Kesmas, 89-98.

Klockner, K., & Hicks, R. E. (2015). Cognitive failures at work, mindfulness, and the Big Five. GSTF Journal of Psychology (JPsych), 2(1), 1-7.

Nurhayati, R., Ma'rufi, I., & Hartanti, R. I. (2017). Penilaian Human Error Probability dengan Metode Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) (Studi di Departemen Finishing PT. Eratex Djaja, Tbk) Assessment of Human Error Probability with Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique Method. Pustaka Kesehatan, 5(3), 565-571

OHSAS 18001: 2007. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems – Requirements. UK: BSI.

OOECD-NEA, (1985). Expert Judgement for Human Reliability. Paris. Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Pamuka, A. S., & Susanto, N. (2018). HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESMENT DENGAN METODE HEART SEBAGAI UPAYA MENGURANGI HUMAN ERROR PADA PT. MULTIPANEL INTERMITRA MANDIRI. Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 7(3).

Pasman, H., & Rogers, W. (2020). “How To Treat Expert Judgment With Certainly It Contains Uncertainty”. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 66, 1-12

Praharsi, Y. (2019). PENGELOLAAN TINGKAT PEMAKAIAN LAPANGAN PENUMPUKAN DAN TINGKAT PENGGUNAAN DERMAGA di PT TERMINAL TELUK LAMONG. Jurnal Teknologi Maritim, 2(1), 7-16.

Stranks, J. W. (2007). Human factors and behavioural safety. Routledge. Swain A.D and Guttmann,1983. Hand Book of Human Reliability Analysis With Emphasis On Nuclear Power Plant Application. US Nuclear Regulatory Commision, Washington, DC.

Williams, J. C., 1986. A Proposed Method for Assessing and Reducing Human Error I. In : (th Advance in Reliability. Technology Symposium (ARTS). Bradford : University of Bradford.

Woods, D. D., Dekker, S., Cook, R., Johannesen, L., & Sarter, N. (2010). “Behind Human Error”. New York: Ashgate Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-14